Editorials :
The fear of which happened: The Supreme also suspected.
Four judges of the Supreme Court in India, after Independence, raised questions against Chief Justice. In the past, a news read in which the MPs did not leave the bungalow, the Supreme Court had commented that God is not able to save this country, but now when the Supreme Court itself is in doubt, then God can save this country. Do not say that, do not exaggerate too much.
After independence, the first judges of the Supreme Court of India, for the first time, organized a press conference today. After the Chief Justice, four senior judges of the Supreme Court, Justice Chalameswar, Justice Madanlokur, Justice Kurien Jassif, Justice Ranjan Gogoi have raised questions on irregularities in the administration of the Supreme Court after talking to the media. A seven-page letter from four judges of the Supreme Court has also come up against. In which case the judge expressed displeasure over the assignment in some casesJudge has alleged that some cases from Chief Justice are given to certain special benchs and judges. Speaking to the media, Justice Chailameshwar, who was adjudged 2nd judge, said, "About two months ago we wrote a letter to Chief Justice of 4 judges and told them that whatever is happening is not right. Governance is not
Governance is not running properly. This case was about the assignment of a case. They said that we were unable to understand our point of view to Chief Justice. So we decided to keep the whole thing in front of the country. It was asked by journalists that they wrote a letter to Chief Justice about the matter. Justice Kurien Jassif said that he was an assignment, it was asked if this is a matter of thickness with the CBI judge Justice Loya's suspicious death.
Kurien said 'yes' among all this is to give the letter written to the CGI to the media, which will explain why the matter is disputed with their Chief Justice regarding the matter. Justice Chalameswar and Justice Kurien Jassif said that we will make that letter public. The whole thing will be clear. Chelaameshwar said that after 20 years nobody can say no. We have sold our soul so we decided Chailameshwar said that in order to preserve democracy in any country including India, it is necessary that the organization of the Supreme Court functioning properly. ChelaMeshwar said that on our letter, now the country has to think about whether the main judicial proceedings against Chief Judge should be run or not. Justice Chalmameshwar said that it is not a matter of happiness that we will have to call a press conference that we have to call a press conference. The Supreme Court's governance is not functioning properly. It has happened in the last few months, which should not happen.
This talk of the Supreme Court judges with the media is extremely important and historic. Usually the judge remains away from the media and publicly holds the judge's chief justice only. It may be recalled that there has been differences between Chief Justice of India Deepak Mishra and second-judge Judge Justice Chalameswar. It has been said in the letter that the general principle is that Chief Justice has the right to make a roster and they decide which bench and judge will hear the matter.
However, it is the jurisdiction of the country that Chief Justice is the first in all the jails. They are not small or larger than anyone. Judge wrote in his letter, "There are many such cases which are of great importance to the country, Chief Justice has handed over such cases to their respective benches rather than on logical basis. Let's go to stop it at any cost. "The letter also states that the institution's reputation is not harmed, so the matter is not being mentioned, but due to this, the judiciary has already damaged the organization.
What do the four judges have written in the letter? - Chief Justice does not comply with the distribution rules of the case - working against tradition, collective decisions are not made - Chief Justice has corrupted the image of the organization - a case which affects the integrity of the Supreme Court, without any reason, Justice preference - Supreme Court works with 24 judges, while the number should be 31 - The burden of the case increases due to the vacancy of judges.
The burden of the case increases as judges are vacant. It is a matter of regret that till now the Indian citizens had only relied on the courts only, the corruption in the field of corruption in every country has filled the democracy, the verdict was the only hope for the court. But the question now is that now where Going away, remember Kishore Kumar's song and leave everything Lord Rama, but now that God can save this country only. At the link of the song I'm "When the fire looks, it rains the rain, but if the rain sets the fire, who will be able to do it?"
- Maa Ashapura News
Bhuj, Kutch, India
9428748643 Wattsapp,
9725206123 - 37
7226086124 - 33
Youtube: maa news live
Android app: maa news
Blog: maanewslive.blogspot.com
The fear of which happened: The Supreme also suspected.
Four judges of the Supreme Court in India, after Independence, raised questions against Chief Justice. In the past, a news read in which the MPs did not leave the bungalow, the Supreme Court had commented that God is not able to save this country, but now when the Supreme Court itself is in doubt, then God can save this country. Do not say that, do not exaggerate too much.
After independence, the first judges of the Supreme Court of India, for the first time, organized a press conference today. After the Chief Justice, four senior judges of the Supreme Court, Justice Chalameswar, Justice Madanlokur, Justice Kurien Jassif, Justice Ranjan Gogoi have raised questions on irregularities in the administration of the Supreme Court after talking to the media. A seven-page letter from four judges of the Supreme Court has also come up against. In which case the judge expressed displeasure over the assignment in some casesJudge has alleged that some cases from Chief Justice are given to certain special benchs and judges. Speaking to the media, Justice Chailameshwar, who was adjudged 2nd judge, said, "About two months ago we wrote a letter to Chief Justice of 4 judges and told them that whatever is happening is not right. Governance is not
Governance is not running properly. This case was about the assignment of a case. They said that we were unable to understand our point of view to Chief Justice. So we decided to keep the whole thing in front of the country. It was asked by journalists that they wrote a letter to Chief Justice about the matter. Justice Kurien Jassif said that he was an assignment, it was asked if this is a matter of thickness with the CBI judge Justice Loya's suspicious death.
Kurien said 'yes' among all this is to give the letter written to the CGI to the media, which will explain why the matter is disputed with their Chief Justice regarding the matter. Justice Chalameswar and Justice Kurien Jassif said that we will make that letter public. The whole thing will be clear. Chelaameshwar said that after 20 years nobody can say no. We have sold our soul so we decided Chailameshwar said that in order to preserve democracy in any country including India, it is necessary that the organization of the Supreme Court functioning properly. ChelaMeshwar said that on our letter, now the country has to think about whether the main judicial proceedings against Chief Judge should be run or not. Justice Chalmameshwar said that it is not a matter of happiness that we will have to call a press conference that we have to call a press conference. The Supreme Court's governance is not functioning properly. It has happened in the last few months, which should not happen.
This talk of the Supreme Court judges with the media is extremely important and historic. Usually the judge remains away from the media and publicly holds the judge's chief justice only. It may be recalled that there has been differences between Chief Justice of India Deepak Mishra and second-judge Judge Justice Chalameswar. It has been said in the letter that the general principle is that Chief Justice has the right to make a roster and they decide which bench and judge will hear the matter.
However, it is the jurisdiction of the country that Chief Justice is the first in all the jails. They are not small or larger than anyone. Judge wrote in his letter, "There are many such cases which are of great importance to the country, Chief Justice has handed over such cases to their respective benches rather than on logical basis. Let's go to stop it at any cost. "The letter also states that the institution's reputation is not harmed, so the matter is not being mentioned, but due to this, the judiciary has already damaged the organization.
What do the four judges have written in the letter? - Chief Justice does not comply with the distribution rules of the case - working against tradition, collective decisions are not made - Chief Justice has corrupted the image of the organization - a case which affects the integrity of the Supreme Court, without any reason, Justice preference - Supreme Court works with 24 judges, while the number should be 31 - The burden of the case increases due to the vacancy of judges.
The burden of the case increases as judges are vacant. It is a matter of regret that till now the Indian citizens had only relied on the courts only, the corruption in the field of corruption in every country has filled the democracy, the verdict was the only hope for the court. But the question now is that now where Going away, remember Kishore Kumar's song and leave everything Lord Rama, but now that God can save this country only. At the link of the song I'm "When the fire looks, it rains the rain, but if the rain sets the fire, who will be able to do it?"
- Maa Ashapura News
Bhuj, Kutch, India
9428748643 Wattsapp,
9725206123 - 37
7226086124 - 33
Youtube: maa news live
Android app: maa news
Blog: maanewslive.blogspot.com
Comments
Post a Comment